Hollywood is so corrupt it has made a movie that says lawlessness is bad, but government giving its citizens permission to kill is good.
The Purge is probably one of the most pathetic left-wing attempts at displaying a "libertarian world" period. The new one is even called "The Purge:Anarchy". As a strong libertarian, and an anarcho-capitalist, I feel a strong need to give my thoughts on a movie that is promoting a statist utopia by "showing" what would happen in a lawless society. I understand this is a movie, but if they're going to make a movie preaching an incorrect message, expect to be corrected. Here comes the kraken, I mean rant.
This is one of the most politically biased movies I've seen in recent memory. I usually ignore the underlining message in movies as they're always peppered with liberal seasonings, but this one puts its message up front, sets it on a unicycle and sets it on fire before it gets mauled by bears. (Right-wing bears) Its so up front about its political agenda it should have been named, "Evil Rich White Religious Male Ring-Wing Pro-Life Tea Party Capitalist Republican Pig Libertarian Anarchism Is Worse Than Terrorism Worship Your Government". Seriously. This movie is DISGUSTINGLY left wing. Another good name could be "Our Lord And Savior Obama, Son Of God The Father Our Government And Holy Mother Hillary Clinton" What the movie says, is that one day a year, all crime is legal. All assistance such as police and hospitals are no longer available for 24 hours... And in that 24 hours, literally all hell breaks loose as every citizen in that nation begin killing EVERYONE. There is so much wrong with 100% of this, you would have to be a brain dead moron to buy into this for a second. The movie says YOU, yes you reading this, it says that you would go out and kill everyone you could find unless you're rich and white and have money to protect yourself. I couldn't bring myself to watch it. I read the screen-play and script stuff online. I'm going to have to tackle each section in a different paragraph as this movie is that stupid.
Lets begin with the governments role in the movie. The government has created a utopia! All people are safe all the time. Isn't that swell, however, the utopia is created through mass murder one day a year where the government ignores its people and encourages them to all go kill each other. Sounds like government utopia to me, everyone killing each other, it ignores its citizens, yeah sounds about right. So first off, the idea that government created utopia is impossible. There is no such thing as this, you want me to believe that a word is going to keep someone from killing someone else? Honestly, people kill now right? And its illegal now. But I guess since one day a year, all crime is legal, meaning through government permission, you are allowed to commit crimes, meaning they have created a law to allow the murder of its own citizens. Which tells me the government is evil. Remember, everything Hitler did was legal. And lets not forget, the government in this movie encourages its citizens to commit crimes as they advertise it everywhere. So this chaos is government created, oops... I guess this movie is proving government is the problem.
Although this movie would have you believe that the rich white family is the problem. As the rich white family has the money to arm their house to stay safe from this purge. But not arm it with guns, no no no, arm it with homeland security. I'm not even kidding. This movie is nothing more than a propaganda piece. As it shows the poor under privileged poverty ridden minimum wage minority workers dying in the streets as the state is no longer there to keep them alive. As if people are literally one word away from killing each other. If all crimes were legal you wanna know what I would do? Everything I do every day. Save my money to buy nice things, relax while watching TV, and pet my cat. But this movie would have you seeing me cutting my neighbors head off with a saw while I steal 100% of everything I own after gutting my friends kids. As I can't afford to live on minimum wage so I'm forced to steal... I'm getting angry sitting here typing this as this is the biggest propaganda piece I've seen in my over twenty years of life. It makes me sick to think people saw this movie.
Speaking of making me sick, Hollywood, Hollywood has ruined movies for me. I no longer go to the movies as everything has a spin on it. There is so much spin on some movies I'm on the verge of puking. If you believe Hitler was far right, congratulations, you are the spawn of this disgusting media. Hitler wanted total government control, which is far left. I also can't stand how Hollywood forgets to mention that in this movie taxation is not thievery, government giving permission for everyone to kill each other is OK, and shutting off all emergency systems is fine as long as government does it. Seriously.. The biased view of government given permission to kill is one of the most atrocious ideas there is. That the one in power will allow those living under its law to kill each other at times. That is no different than dog fighting. But the media says its the lawlessness that's wrong, not the government giving permission to kill.
Now, lets move to everything they got wrong.
1.The word anarchy and anarchism. As they use the word to mean chaos and zero law. When the word really means to practice the art of not being governed, to have no rulers, and to have no masters. However obeying the absolute law which is the NAP and voluntaryism. Which is peaceful. Anarchy is the only non hypocritical and the only peaceful stance in all of the political spectrum. And true anarchy, anarcho-capitalism. Communism uses government meaning it cannot be anarchy.
2.The idea that if everyone were to break laws one day each year, absolutely no other crimes would ever be committed except for on that one day crime is legalized. As if evil is created through freedom, and all authority is pure and to be obeyed even though the authority in this movie created a corrupt law that gives permission to kill.
3.The idea that if there were no laws, all of a sudden everyone turns into a cold blooded murderer that only wants to steal, kill, torture and destroy. Which this is the theory that all creation is evil and must be given a leader. However since everyone is evil that means the leader is too, and he is now the most powerful evil human there is, and will only create an unjust, corrupt empire.
4.If this were to happen, not everyone would just go along with it, there would be an overthrow of this government the day crime is legalized and dismantle this government that allows blood sport.
5.Utopia cannot be reached through government, as no matter what decision is made, someone will disagree no matter what, meaning as long as someone is in control, someone will disagree, disproving the utopian through government theory.
6.If all crime was legal, people would eventually burn down every building, house and structure there is, with no one to put out these fires, cities would burn to the ground in the 24 hours and there would be nothing left. Defeating the entire movie.
7.The flaw is not lawlessness, it is the government granting permission to kill and commit crimes.
8.This movie COMPLETELY leaves out free markets. As, if this were real, the free market would see demand for safety and shelter during this time, and create supply for demand. Which creates jobs and would save lives in this case. Also would create clean up crews, police during this lawless time and you would see 100% privately owned police, fire fighters and other public jobs.
9.They believe that government is order, even though this movie demonstrates a government that steals through taxation, gives its citizens the permission to kill anything and destroy property.
10.The idea so terribly misguided its laughable that if a government were to do this, everyone would just go along with it.
There is so much more I could say but you get the point. This movie is nothing more than government worshiping propaganda. Stop seeing these movies. Stop giving these people money.
The government needs people to survive. People do not need a government to survive.
Live free.
-Ryan
"Victory lies not in the winning of something, but rather in its process"-Ryan Kerr
Well there you go. My first quote. Those 13 words are all I really need to write for this entire piece. However similar quotes are most likely floating everywhere. So to give mine legs to stand on, I'm going to dissect it for you to show you exactly what I mean. And why this self help thought fits my anti-government blog.
First lets tear apart these words. "Victory" means to achieve. Achieve means to reach or attain. "Lies not in the winning" means "not to be found in the goal". "But rather its process" means "but in its particular matter of steps to meet the end". So what I'm saying, is that the victory is the act of bettering yourself by wanting to reach the goal, not the act of obtaining the goal itself. Of course we become happy when we win a basketball or football game. (Not baseball.. That's way too slow to keep my interest. The real sport in baseball is trying to stay awake from beginning to end. Why else does everyone stand up near the end? They see its coming to a close and decide to get ready. Its like attending a horribly grueling family party. "Weeell looks like its about that time". You get your coat and stand near the nearest exit waiting for the goodbyes to stop) But to watch a sport is only to enjoy the final goal which only lasts a few moments. This is why the players feel so much when they win, they worked to get that victory. And why failure is so upsetting to sports fans. Because they have been cheated out of a victory as their team did not work hard enough for the victory. Meaning the fan loses as well.
Creative and intuitive men are driven by the want to achieve Where as the simple man will only try to beat, outdo, or bring down what he himself has not been able to do. This is why I have never been friends with a sports fan. If their team wins something, they gloat and brag about the victory they took no part in and beat their chest like some gorilla climbing a skyscraper. Where if they lose, you never stop hearing how terrible the team you've chosen to cheer for are nothing but a pack of unfair cheaters. The simple man also lives in ignorance by refusing victory through the act of bettering himself to a win, rather he will commit the acts listed above. There is a healthy sport in the rivalry of competition. Not in winning. But the act of bettering yourself in the preparation for the competition is where the victory is found and what should be celebrated. Now I completely disagree withe "You're all winners" garbage, as some do lose, and some do win, and we should congratulate those who reach their win. IF it is a fair win. But I still think teaching each participant that by training, they have bettered them self in whatever they were training for. And should be treated as a victory. Because this teaches marvelous work ethic and that free market with voluntary interaction is good. Because anything that says using force is bad, is a good thing. Teaching morality breeds good behavior. Where teaching taxation, (an immoral action) only breeds immorality. If force is good in some cases, that means a woman saying no is not good enough. And the rapist may force his idea of a good idea to her. But teaching the process is the victory teaches working for something is a positive step. Instead of being annoyed by the training. Teach to find joy in the goal, is to set someone up for failure, as they find joy in that moment, and must tell everyone to relive it. Where bettering yourself through the process of trying to achieve victory lasts for eternity.
Those looking only for self glorification at the win of a race have completely missed the point of taking part in the race. The victory does not does not come in the form of who is first to cross the finish line, but he who finds he has bettered himself as a person through the preparation and training he or she did to become good enough to compete. As before a race, you are slow, become winded quickly, your knees ache, and you are only able to run a short distance. But through training and wanting to achieve victory (not through the state) you have become better in that as you can run the miles due to the work you have put into wanting to see the finish line. So the win should be celebrated. But so should the knowing you have bettered yourself through the act of the process.
This is what is wrong with our government. It caters only to those who wish not to work for a victory them self, but still obtain the goal. Meaning EBT cards. Public healthcare. MONEY. The American government actually pays people to NOT work. That only creates laziness. Weather or not you agree with the bible. We can agree on its moral points of living. (And no I don't mean stoning women... I am so tired of people saying this, saying it was right to stone a woman was not even gods word, as this was a depiction of what was done back in biblical times. These people were uncivilized. The commandments taught against these things) But those living with heavy government handouts and have better phones than I do says something. If I work so many hours a week so I can afford a decent phone and pay its bill. But the person next to me gets his obamaphone for free, and makes zero payments because the state steals my money through taxation to give this person a phone. That is the act of accepting failure by not participating in the process, but still receiving the goal. The perfect analogy is a runner who trained to run a race. But someone refused to train. He must now carry that person with him. Which will result in him failing the race. Which he must now be carried as well. If you disagree, you're wrong and too ignorant to see the truth. The victory is not making 15 dollars an hour. (Which is already killing jobs, taking away benefits, tips, and hours by placing people on part time which even though it is 15 dollars an hour, the cut of hours to keep the store alive means the workers make less in a year than when they made less) But the victory is to start at 7 or 8 dollars with a small apartment. Then with the process. You will make more money, live in a better apartment and be able to live on your own. I have news for you, if you cannot live on your minimum wage. You are trying to live in a way you can not afford. If single mothers of multiple kids with health problems can live on minimum wage. And you say you living at home where your parents feed you and pay your bills cannot be lived on minimum wage. You are trying to live in a way that out spends your income. The process you take in bettering your skills to become better at your job to make more money is what makes you successful! Actually working to make more money so you progressively make more is how success works. You cannot tax my success and give my goal to someone refusing to achieve their own success, that is selfishness and breeds far too much immorality for this to last long.
The idea and mindset that one must win or is a failure lives in fear of the instant moment of losing. Losing and winning both only last seconds. But losing is not shameful. Refusing to take part in fear of losing is shameful. To lose a race shows you were not prepared or have not bettered your skills enough to win yet. To not lose, you must equip yourself with a mind willing to learn. If you lose don't think it was unfair, as the only reason it was unfair, was because you were not prepared for it. Failure is a lesson that means work harder. Not to quit. But to innovate, to learn what must be improved so you can reach your goal. And that is the process. Which is the true victory, and should be taught. As reaching your goal is not some freak accident. Reaching your goal is done by completing your training to reach that goal. THAT victory is the true goal.
This government is backwards. It teaches the many goals reached by those who actually did achieve victory in bettering themselves into prosperity, that will be stolen and given to those who did not want to better themselves. They did not work and still achieved goals by stealing goals of those who did work. That is what taxation is. Taxation is having the goal you've worked for stolen by the state and given to those who chose not to work, which creates dependency, which creates voters that vote for more goals without working for it. Which increases the stealing of goals until those working are forced into dependency by the majority dependent. This is one of the many reasons why democracy does not work.
This mindset, only teaches, "I don't have to work, I still reach my goal of making an income to live off of because others work for their goal, which the state steals a certain percentage of every worker and gives it to me". This will become a festering illness in America very quickly. Within 6 years we have plummeted far from where we were. Each person voting to increase dependency kills another workers ambition to try to keep his head above water while the state continues to pull him deeper into forced dependency. Which then kills another worker, so on and so on. Once there are not enough workers, we will see demise. China is on the verge of passing us already. Soon the nations that have chosen to work will all pass us and America will no longer be the leader of the free world. That day is coming faster every day. The government will be the fall of America. If we continue in big government. Raising taxes lowers income. Lower income makes people demand higher minimum wage. Higher minimum wage raises prices. Raising prices raises taxes. Raising taxes lowers income. Do you see this cycle? Its never ending. And the theory of putting money into the economy stimulates the economy. Do you know this results in 0? Did you know that? Its said that if someone makes more money, they spend more. The money is passed around more and everyones happy. That is not how it works. If you give a store 1 dollar. The government taxes it. Making it 90 cents. That 90 cents is passed on and taxed. Turned to 80 cents. The final result is zero. In the end, the government makes 100% of all money, and we lose it as we purchase things and have our income taxed. Trading money within an economy is having your right hand give your left hand 10 dollars. But by the time your left hand gets it, it gets taxed to 5 dollars. Which is less than what you started with. Dependency on government cannot last. As it will result in 100% government control of the people.We aren't North Korea. But dependency will lead us their...
The victory is in the process of becoming better. Not the end goal.
The government needs people to survive. People do not need a government to survive.
Live free.
-Ryan
Dogs are dangerous and should be illegal to own
Lets imagine something. OK? Lets dust off our brains to create this scenario using nothing but our minds. Here we go.. We should make owning all types of dogs illegal. No one needs a dog, right? So why do we buy them? For entertainment? For protection? For sport? No one needs any of that! Just think of how dangerous they are, there was that video a while back of that kid getting bitten and dragged into the street by one. That sounds pretty dangerous. Don't we want to protect our children? Just think of all the children that have died from dog attacks. Think of how many dog attack victims we would save! Some claim they can train their dog to behave. But how many people don't train their dogs? Not to mention some dogs are much larger and more powerful than others. What would happen if one of these stronger dogs went loose in a public area? These are things we have to think about. I understand some people say they have dogs because they live alone and want to protect their home. But they can just call the police, right? And dogs make me very nervous. Being around them, you can't tell if one is just going to start biting. I guess dogs could remain in the police force, as they sniff out bombs, drugs and such. But not in the hands of the people... We need to ban dogs, and make their being owned illegal to citizens, as they are far too dangerous to be in hands other than the police...
Do you see now? Do you see how truly stupid, pathetic, incoherent and flimsy the idea of gun control is? This is honestly how stupid it looks to us gun owners. Banning guns is no different than banning dogs. They both can kill, they both can save lives, they both can be used in the right and the wrong hands. But the media will have you seeing these adorable fluffy animals to be mans best friend. (except for the pit-bull, which is the M4 of the dogs, the one the media loves to hate) If you trade the word of what you want banned, you very quickly learn how ridiculous it really is. Ban all knives as some have been used to kill. Ban cars! The death toll by cars outweighs the death by guns a million times over. And don't politicians care about those poor hit and run victims? Don't they want justice for the families and protection for the kids? Why not ban the zoo from owning all of those dangerous animals? I mean, that's essentially a militia in animal terms, right? A group of people that collect things that may be dangerous in the wrong hands. If we're banning things lets get serious here. Guns don't kill. HANDS kill people. Hands are attached to every killer there has ever been. Hitler had hands. Hands pull the triggers of guns. They swing the ax to lop off someones head. They turn the steering wheel into the playgrounds, they even text and drive! BAN HANDS. I actually have a YouTube video called, "Public Service Awareness Announcement" on the channel "rymakechannel" where I say ban hands as they kill everyone.(its a spoof) But really, ban water! How many people drowned last year? OK I know, that one was dumb, lets get serious...ban vehicle wheels...
I cannot even begin to list how many things are wrong with banning a form of self defense. To take the right to defend yourself away from the individual is absolute tyranny. Don't they care about women's rights? Gay rights? Why would they not want handicapped people to be allowed to defend themselves? Banning guns makes it illegal for black lesbian transsexual cripples to defend their Muslim adopted liberal children that attend public schools after smoking medical marijuana. Sounds like the democrats hate those that are different. How racist of them. To tell someone, "I understand this is the most efficient way to defend yourself, your family, and your neighbors, but you are not allowed to". Or to say "I know you have chosen this way to defend yourself because as a woman living alone in a bad neighborhood with broken door locks you want to feel safe, independent, and strong on your own. It is now illegal for you to do that, please call a strong male cop to save you when you are in danger, as you are incapable of properly defending yourself" That is disgusting, shameful and completely immoral to remove someones right to defend them self from harm. It makes me sick to watch these politicians, surrounded in guards armed with fully automatic weapons tell me I don't need protection like he has, as I am insignificant compared to him.
The mere suggestion that gun control works... I refuse to even give you a long explanation to why you're wrong. But just know Chicago and Mexico have some of the strictest gun laws/bans/control out there. And they have the worst crimes out of anywhere else. Think of this. If owning a gun for self defense was bad, ineffective, and unsafe. Why do we protect the most important person in this country with guns? Why do police have guns if guns are bad for self defense? Why does every nation on earth defend their nation with guns? Instead of calling the cops, I would rather cut out the middle man, and instead of hoping the police get to my house (police arrive time is usually 5 minutes) before the guy in my house kills me with a gun, I would rather have equal rights and defend myself with a gun. You do know that a gun ban doesn't take guns away from criminals right? It takes away guns from the list of people that own the guns. Do you know how you get on that list? YOU LEGALLY BUY ONE. Criminals do not use this method to obtain guns. They get them without getting listed. I guess politicians do not agree with equal rights. As legal law biding citizens loose their guns, but criminals get to keep them...
And don't get me started on how police are trained to use guns. Last month, some baby had a stun grenade thrown into his crib by police, the child's face is scarred and burned. The police have shot more dogs than I wish to name. Stop believing politicians! These people lie to you. I'm sick of not being able to live my life how I see fit because some disagree with it. Gay people should be all for gun rights! But no, they don't want me to have equal rights. Only their lifestyle, not mine. I get angry because this affects me. It changes my life and how I live it. I bother no one and obey the law. (the law being the N.A.P) I have never hurt anyone in my life, so they want to take away my right.. This is wrong. Self defense should be a universal standard. Even animals defend them self when under attack.. What does that make us? Protect the second amendment. If you believe in banning self defense, which is what gun control is. I want you also actively trying to ban dogs from having teeth and nails. As that is their form of self defense, and you better be trying to ban vehicles as well. They kill people ten times more than people with guns. And are WAY easier to get. Otherwise you are a no good, simple minded, lacking the function of rational thought, don't believe in self defense, hate equal rights, hate women's rights, are a one sided, bigot, racist, ignorant, rotten snake hypocrite. And one more thing, the next time someone is beating the life out of you. You better lie down and accept that entire beating no matter how long it lasts. As you don't believe in the right to self defense. Just use your socialist healthcare and get patched up "for free" afterword...
The government needs people to survive. People do not need a government to survive.
Live free.
-Ryan
